From: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 733208b4879737cec9b49f382b4090bcbd1d77856fa93a5cd5f60cc4c3ac2b02
Message ID: <199701270615.WAA12017@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-27 06:15:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:15:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:15:45 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: libelfrm.htm
Message-ID: <199701270615.WAA12017@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
LIBEL CHECKLIST
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Look for material that identifies a person or an entity.
Keep in mind that it is possible to identify people or entities
without actually using a name. If the material contains identifiable
voices, likenesses, or descriptions, it could be a problem.
___ The material identifies a person or entity.
STOP HERE if the material does not identify a person or entity.
You can't have a libel without someone to complain about it!
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Is any identified person dead?
There is little reason to be concerned with statements or other
material reflecting badly on dead persons because the law only
protects "the memory of the dead," giving no cause of action to
decedents. So long as the material concerns only the dead person,
you need not answer the rest of the questions on this form.
___The person identified is dead.
STOP HERE if the person identified is dead.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
If material identifies a living person, is it:
A private individual.
___A public person.
___A political person.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Would the material negatively influence a reasonable reader's opinion of the
person or entity identified?
___a.
It would reflect badly on the character of the person or
entity.
___b.
It could harm the reputation, diminish the esteem, respect or
good will in which the person or entity's relevant community
holds him, her or it.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
If the material might reflect badly on character and/or harm reputation, would
the harm be the result of:
___An explicit statement.
___An insinuation.
___A sarcastic statement.
___A parody or cartoon.
___An opinion that implies that there are unstated defamatory facts
underlying it.
___Other.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
There are several possible defenses to a claim of defamation, although none may
apply in a particular case. Check one of the following defenses only if you are
fairly certain it would apply.
___The statement or other material is true.
___The statement or other material is purely an expression of opinion
and not an assertion of fact.
___The statement or other material constitutes a fair comment on a
matter of public opinion, for example, the use of public money,
disbarment of attorneys, management of public institutions and
charities, management of private companies whose activities widely
affect the public (pollution, delivery of medical services, common
carriage, employment practices, discrimination, etc.) or the review of
books, public entertainment, sports events or scientific discoveries.
___No one could reasonably interpret the statement or image to be an
assertion of actual fact about the person or entity.
___The statement or image can be characterized as mere words of abuse,
indicating dislike for the person or entity, but does not suggest any
specific charge.
___The subject of the statement or image has given consent to or
approved the material.
_________________ __________
_________________________________________________________________
University Liability for the Wrongful Acts of Employee Publishers |
Copyright Management Center Homepage | Intellectual Property Section
Homepage
_________________________________________________________________
8 August 1995
University of Texas System Office of General Counsel
Comments to gharper@utsystem.edu
_________________________________________________________________
Return to January 1997
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>”
1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:15:45 -0800 (PST)) - libelfrm.htm - Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>