From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com
Message Hash: 73a666522cfb2d07212d5898ee179b7704fbea1c6b0e9c0d0b58884f32ca41f9
Message ID: <32E51979.5369@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: <199701210140.RAA25601@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-21 18:33:55 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:33:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:33:55 -0800 (PST)
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: Dr. Vulis' social engineering experiment
In-Reply-To: <199701210140.RAA25601@toad.com>
Message-ID: <32E51979.5369@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike McNally wrote:
> Why anyone would expect any particular degree of
> "freedom" to use a service run for free by a private individual
> is beyond me.
I agree, totally.
Just because an individual claims, rightly or wrongly, to be a
big defender of freedom, involving himself or herself in causes
like those of the Electronic Freedom Foundation, does not take
away their right to stomp on anyone who disagrees with them on
their own private list.
To claim otherwise would be as ludicrous as denying the person
running the Anonymizer the right to expose the identities of the
people he feels might perhaps be abusing his private system, or
using it for nefarious purposes, such as hiding their identity
from others.
Toto
> I appreciate the service, but I don't take it for granted and I
> certainly don't take it as an inalienable right.
>
> ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> Mike McNally -- Egregiously Pointy -- Tivoli Systems, "IBM" -- Austin
> mailto:m5@tivoli.com mailto:m101@io.com http://www.io.com/~m101
> ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Return to January 1997
Return to “Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>”