From: proff@suburbia.net
To: nelson@media.mit.edu (Nelson Minar)
Message Hash: 80abbcd21eea02077e855aa64258322698cf17d7c121771983d91f543a44866e
Message ID: <19970114235303.6177.qmail@suburbia.net>
Reply To: <cpag204huqp.fsf@hattrick.media.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-14 23:57:02 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:57:02 -0800 (PST)
From: proff@suburbia.net
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:57:02 -0800 (PST)
To: nelson@media.mit.edu (Nelson Minar)
Subject: Re: New US regs ban downloadable data-security software
In-Reply-To: <cpag204huqp.fsf@hattrick.media.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <19970114235303.6177.qmail@suburbia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green) writes:
> > Commercial data security software of any kind, regardless if it uses crypto
> > or not, is however prohibited from being distributed via the Internet or
> > being exported by any other means.
>
> I can at least vaguely understand the rationale behind restricting the
> export of cryptography. But I don't even begin to comprehend
> restricting the export of data security software. What is going on
> here? Whose idea is this, what is the agenda?
>
If you read ITAR you will see that State explicity bans export of any
operating system with a security rating of B2 or above.
The adgenda is pretty obvious.
Cheers,
Julian <proff@iq.org>
Return to January 1997
Return to “Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>”