1997-01-11 - Re: IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: DataETRsch@aol.com
Message Hash: 82b0f3c4f88b016c46a23a8a96bcb06947f3bd07b358fd6dcdbac9d0921ec823
Message ID: <199701111950.NAA07011@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <970111120551_1074845300@emout20.mail.aol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-11 19:54:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 11:54:47 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 11:54:47 -0800 (PST)
To: DataETRsch@aol.com
Subject: Re: IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary
In-Reply-To: <970111120551_1074845300@emout20.mail.aol.com>
Message-ID: <199701111950.NAA07011@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


DataETRsch@aol.com wrote:
> By the way, has anyone out there even tried using UDCM to encrypt a file or
> two? I do not know how some of you can say that IMDMP is a simple XOR-ing and
> AND-ing algorithm without trying it first. I find it extremely hard to
> believe that the celebrated creator(s) of Blowfish, IDEA, etc. had to go
> through all of this ritualistic screening complexity too. (Please do correct
> me if I am wrong.)

yes, you are wrong.

> (For the record: DataET Research's promotional agent has been fired.)

Can you prove that?

> 
> Questions, queries, or comments ("gulp")? E-Mail: DataETRsch@aol.com,
> JKYuRamos@aol.com, or DataETResearch@geocities.com. Note: From now on, any
> messages to DataET Research that do not contain the text "NO FLAME" somewhere
> in the subject heading will be ignored completely. If a message is a indeed
> flame, the associated server's administrator will be contacted, and a
> complaint will be filed accordingly.

Jeremy, if you ignore them, how can you complain about them?

Something fishy is going on?

	- Igor.





Thread