From: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8690262261d5c5504258f0473f3b8b4b6b0c4aa6877475cad569afd55a6c8a8b
Message ID: <199701270412.UAA07410@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-27 04:12:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:12:27 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:12:27 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Fighting the cybercensor
Message-ID: <199701270412.UAA07410@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net> writes:
> Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> > jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com> writes:
> > > Look, I've proposed what I consider to be a remarkably consistent method
> > > prevent the kind of political tyranny that you criticize, and I don't see
> > > any recognition of this fact.
>
> > I said many times that I find AP a very interesting notion, worthy of study
> > Given how fast online gambling is growing, how soon do we have to wait for
> > a web site for taking bets on deaths of politicians and other prominents?
> > Why not set one up, using "funny money" not convertible to anything?
>
> If AP could really work, and AP is enabled by strong p-k crypto,
> that fact alone would justify the Washington boys doing *everything*
> in their power to stop *real* crypto (i.e., no back doors).
But they can't; and their efforts (ITAR, EAR, et al) are totally irrelevant
and ineffective and not worth the time people spend fighting them.
A prototype AP betting server, first limited to very innocent events (like
usenet postings containing certain regexps) and using "funny money" for bets,
would be a good demo.
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
Return to January 1997
Return to ““Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>”
1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:12:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fighting the cybercensor - “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>