From: “Thaddeus J. Beier” <thad@hammerhead.com>
To: “sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: 86ed181af8640e282f407343daa291309901ad4f2b6224be6a98dcd81a8dafcc
Message ID: <199701211440.GAA06630@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-21 14:40:29 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 06:40:29 -0800 (PST)
From: "Thaddeus J. Beier" <thad@hammerhead.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 06:40:29 -0800 (PST)
To: "sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: Question on Diffie-Hellman patent
Message-ID: <199701211440.GAA06630@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> > Diffie-Hellman 4,200,770 Sept. 6, 1977 Apr. 29, 1980 Sept. 6, 1997
> > Hellman-Merkle 4,218,582 Oct. 6, 1977 Aug. 19, 1980 Oct. 6, 1997
> > RSA 4,405,829 Dec. 14, 1977 Sept. 20, 1983 Sept. 20, 2000
>
> So who's planning on throwing a big party on Sept. 6th? Will Jim Bizos be
> celebrating? :-)
Well, Jim Bizdos now has an unlimited license to the DH and HM
patents, due to a recent settlement with Cylink, so he probably
won't be celebrating.
I'd wait 'til the October 6th date for the real party, RSA and
Cylink's lawyers have always claimed the HM gave them a claim to
all of public key cryptography...that's the one I've been waiting
for, and it's only another month :-) This is going to be a very
good year.
If you look at Roger Schlafly's home page,
http://bbs.cruzio.com/~schlafly
you'll see that he's been fighting these guys for years; and he concedes
now that even with his herculean efforts to move the process along, the
trial probably won't come to a head before the patents expire. I'd love
to see his estimate of how much their lawyers have spent on this over
the
years...
-- Thaddeus Beier thad@hammerhead.com
Visual Effects Supervisor 408) 287-6770
Hammerhead Productions http://www.got.net/people/thad
Return to January 1997
Return to ““Thaddeus J. Beier” <thad@hammerhead.com>”
1997-01-21 (Tue, 21 Jan 1997 06:40:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Question on Diffie-Hellman patent - “Thaddeus J. Beier” <thad@hammerhead.com>