From: Lou Poppler <lwp@mail.msen.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 881d3df1b4488075829e9a4f8d11fbae5aba9eb7962ea458d1eb562dfc6ed47b
Message ID: <199701271746.JAA29041@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-27 17:46:43 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 09:46:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Lou Poppler <lwp@mail.msen.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 09:46:43 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Moderated list is missing headers
Message-ID: <199701271746.JAA29041@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
The arguments about imaginary quotes and libel are harder to untangle
because the moderation process seems to consume the mail headers showing
the messages' travels before reaching toad.com. I suggest that these
headers are signal not noise, and should be propagated if at all possible.
We have had problems in the past with forgeries, and should retain this
basic tool for evaluating a message's source.
<preemptive remarks>
I know I could get these from the unmoderated list -- but I prefer the
moderated version so far, and think they should be here also.
I know PGP signatures are a better way of authenticating a message.
</preemptive remarks>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Received: from toad.com (toad.com [140.174.2.1]) by mail.msen.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA02344 for <lwp@mail.msen.com>; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 10:58:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA24082; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 06:41:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199701271441.GAA24082@toad.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 04:33:05 -0800
From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Fantasy quotes & libel
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Precedence: bulk
[ message body irrelevant ]
Return to January 1997
Return to ““Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>”