1997-01-29 - Re: Fighting the cybercensor

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com
To: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 8d8affefecf859494e4daf64a6445fa7ad4358107e507a4115a776bb7768e94e
Message ID: <199701290610.WAA20615@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-29 06:10:50 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 22:10:50 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 22:10:50 -0800 (PST)
To: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Fighting the cybercensor
Message-ID: <199701290610.WAA20615@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Steve Schear wrote:
> 
> >jim bell wrote:
> >>
> >> At 10:21 PM 1/26/97 -0800, blanc wrote:
> >> >From:        jim bell (in response to Dimitri Vulis')
> >> >Look, I've proposed what I consider to be a remarkably consistent method to
> >> >prevent the kind of political tyranny that you criticize, and I don't see
> >> >any recognition of this fact.
> >> >........................................................
> >> >
> >> >1) Jim, why do you insist on discussing this on an forum for encryption?
> >>
> >> Because it's on-topic, that's why.  Because it's not merely a list
> >> concerning METHODS of encryption, it's also about the _reasons_ for using
> >> encryption, as well as the _effects_ (both small-scale and large-scale) of
> >> using encryption.
> >
> >Actually AP is one of the more interesting topics here. I think that there
> >is a clear need for an AP bot.
> >
> >Do you feel like writing it?
> >
> >        - Igor.
> 
> Jim's all talk, I on the other hand am serious.  Did you receive my Monday
> e-mail?
> 

yes, and found it interesting.

	- Igor.






Thread