1997-01-03 - Re: Anonymous Remailer at DHP.com

Header Data

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9a6be04143ce94b568f36103a21f3ec17b57242e0228a8c5ec19e61016f27c45
Message ID: <199701032056.MAA12850@mailmasher.com>
Reply To: <970103104111_1722786644@emout07.mail.aol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-03 20:57:05 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 12:57:05 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 12:57:05 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous Remailer at DHP.com
In-Reply-To: <970103104111_1722786644@emout07.mail.aol.com>
Message-ID: <199701032056.MAA12850@mailmasher.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jill014@aol.com writes:

> But why do you always use the anonymous remailer from DHP.com?
> Why do you not use other places?

Whom are you asking?  Personally, I use at least 4 remailers for every
message I send.  I have a chain of 3 I trust, and have premail
automatically select a reliable remailer for the last hop.  It may
just be that dhp.com has been high on the list lately.  So a lot of
messages have been coming from there.






Thread