1997-01-24 - Online Spending with Smart Cards and E.Cash to To US$3.5bn by year 2000

Header Data

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9f9b0f39216e3074866ab52da3937af72a89dfd942eefb64f425070c4b47ae78
Message ID: <199701242114.NAA07699@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-24 21:14:19 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 13:14:19 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 13:14:19 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Online Spending with Smart Cards and E.Cash to To US$3.5bn by year 2000
Message-ID: <199701242114.NAA07699@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



--- begin forwarded text


Date: Fri, 24 Jan 97 00:04:40 +0100
To: dcsb@ai.mit.edu
Subject: Online Spending with Smart Cards and E.Cash to To US$3.5bn by year
2000
Cc: nelson@media.mit.edu.geer@OpenMarket.com
From: a9050756@unet.univie.ac.at (Mike Alexander)
Sender: bounce-dcsb@ai.mit.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: a9050756@unet.univie.ac.at (Mike Alexander)


>>[some Fed reserve guy's] argument for stored value cards is that the
>>business costs of handling cash are so substantial that there is room
>>for merchants to discount purchases when made by a means that does
>>not require that handling cost.
>
>Does anyone know of a source for information on the overhead of
>accepting various forms of payment? I assume the cost of cash is
>smaller than credit cards for purchases under, say, $500. Any
>estimates on smart cards? On pure digital cash (delivered via a
>browser)?
>
>I'm particularly interested in micropayments, but the larger question
>is interesting as well.

I've worked on this topic extensively in the past months (writing a doctoral
thesis on efficiency and risk in the payment system). I can assure you this:
cash in is still and will remain one of the most efficient payment
instruments.
This holds looking at it from a private as well as social cost perspective
with
sufficient empirical support.



Best Regards,

Michael Alexander
Doctoral Student at the University of Vienna

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.3i

mQCNAzIhxYwAAAEEALtfkL/X6GuZpEECWnmkmbqqtGwNalb94Om82VUiBE8iU1OX
2e5WXQGsq1oManSqVQn3TpVo7VE9pMJr5vITAmkEA6szGRt5zbK5u/dIqhLnJnRE
sVpiY61Xw6RvQKoXX7LSqOYSCqvIiY8GJ5gRpiKQNPZVuJRqbLipmU0fPqylAAUR
tDFNaWNoYWVsIEYuIEFsZXhhbmRlciA8YTkwNTA3NTZAdW5ldC51bml2aWUuYWMu
YXQ+iQCVAwUQMiHFjbipmU0fPqylAQGy4QP+LjB6lZXVYFZDpoVB7j8AGvkghSsr
XicZapXPmsFX6xpt+S29EF4DGoDJIDq6VLJMZ2rQ1gFfEvvWzL7ekZ3orhLSpJoO
WWRZF1MNZVWBNhzxBcdK2T6yrx4cBwQX7t299Ho0y1Go69VE9e3LN8YInIXoQYp5
bc4M0u16GqmV5eI=
=5l49
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe from the dcsb list, send a letter to: Majordomo@ai.mit.edu
In the body of the message, write:  unsubscribe dcsb
Or, to subscribe,           write:  subscribe dcsb
If you have questions, write to me at Owner-DCSB@ai.mit.edu

--- end forwarded text



-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"The cost of anything is the foregone alternative" -- Walter Johnson
The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/rah/
FC97: Anguilla, anyone? http://www.ai/fc97/
"If *you* don't go to FC97, *I* don't go to FC97"








Thread