1997-01-02 - Re: benefits of EAR (not)?

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk (Adam Back)
Message Hash: 9faf74a5e150ea484c8f4dca35c6b81c2cc82b57dfbb7a27fa01d036706e1d29
Message ID: <199701021635.LAA15145@homeport.org>
Reply To: <199701011823.SAA01596@server.test.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-02 16:39:57 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 08:39:57 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 08:39:57 -0800 (PST)
To: aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk (Adam Back)
Subject: Re: benefits of EAR (not)?
In-Reply-To: <199701011823.SAA01596@server.test.net>
Message-ID: <199701021635.LAA15145@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Adam Back wrote:

| Reading through "http://jya.com/bxa123096.txt":
| 
| >     1. This interim rule has been determined to be significant for
| > purposes of E.O. 12866. A cost benefit analysis has been prepared and
| > is available upon request by contacting James A. Lewis at (202) 482-
| > 0092.
| 
| Anyone availed themselves of this offer of a CBA for EAR?  Just
| curious as to what the supposed benefits are :-)

	I called that number, was told I needed to talk to Bruce Kutz,
202 482 4439, who offered to fax it to me, but since I'll be pretty
busy I had him snail mail it.  Easier to read that way.

Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume







Thread