1997-01-20 - Re: Monitoring the monitors

Header Data

From: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a4688c13266ebf6a2e5b069db992ff2d939e352cd1a96ded841170428d47c4b8
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970120163621.1567B-100000@eclipse.voicenet.com>
Reply To: <199701201611.IAA12370@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-20 21:36:06 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 13:36:06 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 13:36:06 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Monitoring the monitors
In-Reply-To: <199701201611.IAA12370@toad.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970120163621.1567B-100000@eclipse.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sun, 19 Jan 1997, Ross Wright wrote:

> On or About 19 Jan 97 at 17:37, Dale Thorn wrote:
> 
> > Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.  We already get the censored stuff
> > on the alleged-to-be "unedited" list, so by looking at the censored
> > list only, we can do the subtraction more reliably than Sandfort.
> > 
> > Just the censored list is needed, not the cut-out stuff, as far as I
> > know.
> 
> I disagree.  Or I don't quite understand what you are saying.  I
> want to see the moderated list and I want to see what was removed.

You can see what was removed by comparing the unedited and moderated lists.
Allow a certain lagtime (24 hours, perhaps) for moderated messages to arrive
and run a diff on the two folders.  This will give you the rejected material.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBMuPmMizIPc7jvyFpAQGQqwf/f8TGLE4RC0n7Xr2Ut35MtqE4B5pwDbpp
tcGAjKAprzTRA/H5TIUTbV2/ZYvP60kFx/ZFoKvDNqaYb9lyU+XrYRCBAPyaxGND
19ZMHJ6qsqOjCxHHj2wP04Dpvv8BQ1rASibImYwAG4YFA65NRqeNdtjGNCKPWZtm
bmMC03aUl/1dhhU1uSMw+Ps9okmW7tfBuuXW6q7tchNQ3kH8blYbZr1eyWSAHH+J
uCdc4oV5eVgfvlKLLt0iU6DNoJUFitYtCRcFsIHH64B4VijFLigw0bUH0z1DOqsW
n7Mlp3IUaVcHnOuyKLg362455n7UygVPmAIpFewlI5mX7/6VaNgjCg==
=GAUL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread