From: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b0fa4ad0d087116454d80893129649a33cc2f758ca445d27cb1642c9ee274817
Message ID: <199701122125.NAA16170@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-12 21:25:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 13:25:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 13:25:48 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: At the risk of getting flamed :)
Message-ID: <199701122125.NAA16170@kachina.jetcafe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Dr. Vulis writes:
> Cypherpunks have been forging Usenet posts from "freedom-knights@jetcafe.org"
> to alt.business.* et al, asking for business opps in e-mail. I'm thinking of
> forwarding the resulting spam on f-k back to cypherpunks.
Two things about this, to BOTH lists.
As a Freedom Knight, it is my opinion that the appropriate
demonstration for Freedom Knights is to ignore this junk email.
This appears to be proceeding quite well, if a minor annoyance to some.
However, I cannot in good conscience personally accept a "J'accuse"
cypherpunks of forging Usenet posts to freedom knights. Since we have
no proof of this action, it is my opinion that we must adhere to
"innocent until proven guilty".
I would like everyone to understand that this accusation is not shared
(nor even considered until seeing the above quote) by myself, nor
should it be shared by anyone who is or who calls themself a "Freedom
Knight".
Honor before blind support, Observation before belief, Truth before
justice. Those who understand these principles will not be harmed
by the net.
------
Dave Hayes - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org
Freedom Knight of Usenet - http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet
What we see depends on mainly what we look for.
Return to January 1997
Return to “Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>”
1997-01-12 (Sun, 12 Jan 1997 13:25:48 -0800 (PST)) - Re: At the risk of getting flamed :) - Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>