1997-01-08 - RE: Thoughts on moderation

Header Data

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: b8c207caa77a03fb66611faceeca379262e73547878cf75ac915c8e050006abf
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-970108000928Z-10372@INET-05-IMC.itg.microsoft.com>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1997-01-08 00:09:18 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 16:09:18 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 16:09:18 -0800 (PST)
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Thoughts on moderation
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-970108000928Z-10372@INET-05-IMC.itg.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	Douglas Barnes

I don't see this move as censorship of any sort -- cleaning the Augean
stables is more like it. I am profoundly tired of wading through
completely worthless and vapid trash accusing Tim and John of various
sexual perversions.
..................................................

So what about determining the lowest parameter of tolerance for style &
content -  how low you can go before your messages are transferred to
the "flames" division?   Then, for instance, Uni could say to Dale:
"you will find my detailed retort to your deluded accusations on the
other list" (which Dale would, of course, go over there and read <g>).

In any case, everyone would know what that sensitive, low point of
intolerance is such that if they descend to it they will be sifted out
and recategorized.

   ..
Blanc






Thread