From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: b8c207caa77a03fb66611faceeca379262e73547878cf75ac915c8e050006abf
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-970108000928Z-10372@INET-05-IMC.itg.microsoft.com>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-08 00:09:18 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 16:09:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 16:09:18 -0800 (PST)
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Thoughts on moderation
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-970108000928Z-10372@INET-05-IMC.itg.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Douglas Barnes
I don't see this move as censorship of any sort -- cleaning the Augean
stables is more like it. I am profoundly tired of wading through
completely worthless and vapid trash accusing Tim and John of various
sexual perversions.
..................................................
So what about determining the lowest parameter of tolerance for style &
content - how low you can go before your messages are transferred to
the "flames" division? Then, for instance, Uni could say to Dale:
"you will find my detailed retort to your deluded accusations on the
other list" (which Dale would, of course, go over there and read <g>).
In any case, everyone would know what that sensitive, low point of
intolerance is such that if they descend to it they will be sifted out
and recategorized.
..
Blanc
Return to January 1997
Return to “Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>”
1997-01-08 (Tue, 7 Jan 1997 16:09:18 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Thoughts on moderation - Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>