1997-01-05 - Re: New rules for Internet sales to CA buyers

Header Data

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: Ian Goldberg <iang@cs.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: bf03eb6964fb825b05c858ffb896fa87ba54067f7592d5062923f01e5b15947e
Message ID: <32CF4FDE.570A@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19970102144026.0069bc00@mail.io.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-05 05:10:38 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 21:10:38 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 21:10:38 -0800 (PST)
To: Ian Goldberg <iang@cs.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: New rules for Internet sales to CA buyers
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970102144026.0069bc00@mail.io.com>
Message-ID: <32CF4FDE.570A@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Ian Goldberg wrote:
 
> So is this saying that a merchant _anywhere in the world_ can be prosecuted
> under California law if someone in California goes to their web page,
> and the web page doesn't satisfy the requirements (which I snipped)?
> 
> How is a merchant in, say, Finland, supposed to know that this law (or others
> like it in any city, state, or country in the world) exists?

  Ignorance is no excuse for violating the law.  This is a standard
legal
principle which can be loosely translated as, "It's not 'our' problem
that you're not psychic, sucker."







Thread