From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 07:16:35 -0800 (PST)
To: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: Sandy Loses His Gold Star
In-Reply-To: <32EF54AD.7C0A@sk.sympatico.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970129065020.28830L-100000@crl13.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Toto wrote:

> Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>  
>  > On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
>  
>  > > Why is a mere "I see" classified as cypherpunks-flames???
>  > > Stop picking on girls, Sandy.
>  
>  > It wasn't and I wasn't.
>  
>    It was and you did.

No, I classified it as "spam" and sent it to the list set aside 
for that, cypherpunks-flames.  Several such spams--from members 
of both sexes--have been treated the same way, so girls were net
especially picked on.  In any event, no one was "picked on" by
that decision.  The people in question self-selected themselves
by posting spam.

Why "spam"?  Because of the childish inclusion of pages of 
no-longer-relevant previous comments.  Whether intentional or
merely negligent, the net effect is to spam the list.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~