From: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: c8ee47b7d347fa91fa59f81c4a065591c20c0c6907dc86c585d4ca362370e943
Message ID: <199701212144.NAA12421@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-21 21:44:28 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 13:44:28 -0800 (PST)
From: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 13:44:28 -0800 (PST)
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Netscape to use Cybercash?
Message-ID: <199701212144.NAA12421@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
(S.Schear tells me that he thinks the lack of anonymity in
payment schemes is what is primarily what is holding them
back, not good GUI interfaces. I consider this hogwash,
but maybe we can agree to disagree.)
Lucky Green writes:
>Netscape has announce that Navigator will ship with CyberCash.
>There is definitely movement at the browser/server end.
whoa, I missed this. was there any discussion on this list? or
is it just because we are drowning in noise? any more specifics?
I personally am hoping for a point-and-click interface with
the piggybank/cost HTML tag scenario I described. also, any ETA?
Return to January 1997
Return to ““Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>”
1997-01-21 (Tue, 21 Jan 1997 13:44:28 -0800 (PST)) - Netscape to use Cybercash? - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>