From: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
To: “Attila T. Hun” <attila@primenet.com>
Message Hash: ca5dc2fdf3666f59bdec4b3b172c59141e147c6a29825312a03fe2f2ebb5c719
Message ID: <199701311510.HAA15741@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-31 15:10:56 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 07:10:56 -0800 (PST)
From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 07:10:56 -0800 (PST)
To: "Attila T. Hun" <attila@primenet.com>
Subject: Re: Geiger and long, unreadable lines
Message-ID: <199701311510.HAA15741@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In <199701311303.GAA01678@infowest.com>, on 01/31/97 at 12:58 PM,
"Attila T. Hun" <attila@primenet.com> said:
> If Geiger's software works as well as his ongoing comprehension of
> the problem 90 to 100 character long mail message lines cause, we
> are all in trouble.
> mail which might be forwarded, commented a few times, etc. really
> works best with 72-74 characters maximum per line.
Well considering that we are approaching the 21st Century I think it is a
little silly that one should have to worry about the line length in an
e-mail message. Even the dos based programs from the 80's could handle
wordwraping of displayed text.
<sigh> for the benifit of those misfortunate enough to be still working on
dumb terminals I have disabled my PGP script until I have time to add a
word wrap routine to it.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
Finger whgiii@amaranth.com for PGP Key and other info
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: One man's Windows are another man's walls.
Return to February 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”