From: “Bill Campbell” <wcampbel@peganet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d6d26c0a5eee887f84216cef80335f460a6b42386a0f7c3c9aba811829336e0d
Message ID: <199701230533.AAA13403@mercury.peganet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-23 05:42:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 21:42:23 -0800 (PST)
From: "Bill Campbell" <wcampbel@peganet.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 21:42:23 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Commerce Sec. Hearings and Encryption
Message-ID: <199701230533.AAA13403@mercury.peganet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I have been watching the confirmation hearings for William Daley,
and I was amazed at the number of references in the questioning
to encryption. I have been watching confirmation hearings for a long
time and have never noticed this much attention being placed on such
a (formerly?) obscure topic.
It appears that encryption is definitely a big blip on the
governmental radar screen now, although whether this is a good
thing or a bad thing is definitely a debatable question. It's
interesting to me that all this interest is coming up in a
confirmation hearing for a *commerce* secretary. Maybe the
commercial aspects of encryption can have a positive impact
on the current restrictions; privacy rights certainly haven't had
any impact.
=Bill=
Return to January 1997
Return to ““Bill Campbell” <wcampbel@peganet.com>”
1997-01-23 (Wed, 22 Jan 1997 21:42:23 -0800 (PST)) - Commerce Sec. Hearings and Encryption - “Bill Campbell” <wcampbel@peganet.com>