From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: “Phillip M. Hallam-Baker” <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
Message Hash: e49b4c4543e5d2d28cd84ccb5a6a899f50f2c83fddd2b18d8744463a49fae82c
Message ID: <32EDAF27.727B@gte.net>
Reply To: <199701280301.TAA14685@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-28 07:48:43 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 23:48:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 23:48:43 -0800 (PST)
To: "Phillip M. Hallam-Baker" <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Fighting the cybercensor
In-Reply-To: <199701280301.TAA14685@toad.com>
Message-ID: <32EDAF27.727B@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Phillip M. Hallam-Baker wrote:
> Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net> wrote in article
> > blanc wrote:
> > > From: Dr.Dimitri Vulis
This [below] is one of the most remarkable posts I've ever seen....
> > > However U.S.G. is able to say that people of Iraq or Lybia or Cuba
> > > should not be permitted on the 'net. It also bombs Iraq and murders
> > > their civilians in retaliation for something their governments
> > > supposedly did.
> > > The U.S.G. has many more resources than most of us to do these things,
> > > including equipment, cooperative troops, money, and recognition from
> > > other governments. If other nations disagree with the U.S.G. they
> > > have the resources to discuss, bargain, negotiate, criticize, form
> > > alliances, take their chances and retaliate, etc.
> > I wish this were true, at least of nations which would be friendly
> > to someone like me (white, Western, etc.). A bully on a school
> > playground can always be knocked down, no matter how big or how
> > vicious he is. Sadly, the U.S. bully cannot be knocked down. Bad
> > enough you get nuclear, chemical, and/or biological stuff waved at
> > you - if you get into a hot war like Desert Storm, your country is
> > carpet-bombed with fleets of B-52's until it is thoroughly debilitated.
> Actually the US is being remarkably ineffective in keeping
> Cuba etc off the Net. If you don't believe me just try
> the cuban home page. We had a Web server running in Sarajevo
> during the siege back in '93. There is no way that the US govt.
> can hope to control the Internet any more than it can control the
> phone system. What is astonishing is that the Cuban authorities are
> so keen to import a technology that breaks down their propaganda.
This *is* amazing. The cuban govt. is *eager* (keen) to subvert
their own propaganda.
> The Cold War was not won by the arms race, it was won in
> Eastern Europe which was never a major participant. The main
> instrument that won it was West German TV which broadcast
> pictures of supermarkets with full shelves into the homes
> of East Germans every night. The viewers could see that it
> was not mere propaganda and their relatives confirmed the
> fact. As a result the East German guards on the Berlin wall
> simply decided to leave their posts one night.
That's it? The system collapsed because the guards left their posts?
And no mutiny charges? Incredible.
> The East Germans couldn't stop the TV signals either. When
> Dresden started to become a ghost town because people wanted
> to move to a town which could recieve the broadcasts the
> East Germans ended up installing their own relay to keep
> the locals happy.
People left their own home towns just so they could watch TV? I
know a lot of Americans who'd like to leave their towns to get away
from TV, permanently.
Return to January 1997
Return to ““Phillip M. Hallam-Baker” <hallam@ai.mit.edu>”