1997-01-14 - RE: New US regs ban downloadable data-security software
Header Data
From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: ea8a60e84aa2fdc59232121e88bca31b9e955959c81c505421d6bf179a0b2f4e
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-970114023430Z-29584@INET-01-IMC.microsoft.com>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-14 02:34:13 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 18:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 18:34:13 -0800 (PST)
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: New US regs ban downloadable data-security software
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-970114023430Z-29584@INET-01-IMC.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
If the 5D002 reasons find no exception for EI under Sec 742.15 (d)
inconsistent with E.O. 13026 (61 FR 58767), then does the NS go the way
of AT, or this just become a NNI?
The RISKS: the government suddenly creating (and putting into effect)
new subparagraphs using large numbers of new acronyms, without warning
or (in my opinion) justification.
..
Blanc (LOL)
Thread
Return to January 1997
Return to “Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>”
1997-01-14 (Mon, 13 Jan 1997 18:34:13 -0800 (PST)) - RE: New US regs ban downloadable data-security software - Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>