1997-01-17 - Re: FC: Loving v. University of Oklahoma, from The Netly News Network

Header Data

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: ec84cb8281d1659f42eeb94e9a864b7237d68ee6cdc6dde656a3f90083a20b94
Message ID: <32DF113E.708A@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970116084156.22133A-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-17 08:12:42 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 00:12:42 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 00:12:42 -0800 (PST)
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: FC: Loving v. University of Oklahoma, from The Netly News Network
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970116084156.22133A-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <32DF113E.708A@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Declan McCullagh wrote:
> The Netly News Network
> http://netlynews.com/
> 
>       Loving v. the University of Oklahoma goes to trial in a federal
>    court in Tulsa tomorrow morning. But the incidents that gave rise to
>    the civil action occurred more than 14 months ago when a local
>    anti-pornography group, Oklahomans for Children and Families, got wind
>    of the sprawling alt.sex.* hierarchy on Usenet. The porn watchdog
>    group complained to State Rep. Fred Perry (R-Tulsa) about the alt.sex
>    feeds that were, naturally enough, part of the university's Usenet
>    feed.
> 
>       Anderson told us that his group is training other activists to turn
>    in offending service providers. "There are plums ready to be picked,"
>    he said. "We're encouraging people all over the country to take
>    action."

  I would advise all cryptographers and cryptanalysts to immediately 
remove any brooms they own from their homes.
  Especially those living in Salem.

Toto







Thread