From: David Wuertele <dave@cave.gctech.co.jp>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ede7362c178a9d2f4826ee506000d74696a687d917d3c949a1a241dbb8524492
Message ID: <ygepvzej5kl.fsf@cave.gctech.co.jp>
Reply To: <199701082322.XAA09234@brd.ie>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-10 08:31:47 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:31:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Wuertele <dave@cave.gctech.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:31:47 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [IDEA] Cypherpunks Super Computer (was Re: The Upcoming DES Challenge)
In-Reply-To: <199701082322.XAA09234@brd.ie>
Message-ID: <ygepvzej5kl.fsf@cave.gctech.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
"Frank O'Dwyer" <fod@brd.ie> writes:
> However, what if there was a safe scripting language with bignum
> arithmetic and other cryptographic primitives, and what if
> lots of people ran a service that would accept scripts in
> that language and respond with the answer? Say, a Safe-TCL
> interface to Peter Gutmann's cryptlib, running at idle
> priority? Sort of like a distributed batch queue, and also
> a bit like the way jobs are (were?) submitted to Crays. The
> Cypherpunks Super Computer. It need not be significantly slower
> than raw code if the primitives are high level enough.
Perl 5.0 has a better, simpler, safety mode than Java (and probably Safe-TCL
too), and runs on more machines. It is also the standard for CGI, so anyone
already running CGI could simply add a perl-based crypto service.
Dave
Return to January 1997
Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>”