1997-01-18 - Re: [STATS] Cypherpunks-unedited subscriptions

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f4124f28e3f2dc0eafa045ba6e882f0621f706752152103b88f912feab07d978
Message ID: <BHRq1D25w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19970118090523.006ac2fc@best.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-18 20:41:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 12:41:15 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 12:41:15 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [STATS] Cypherpunks-unedited subscriptions
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970118090523.006ac2fc@best.com>
Message-ID: <BHRq1D25w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


i.am.not.a.number@best.com writes:

> dang!  i forgot to change.
> what's the moderated list being called?
> which is this one?  yikes --- i've been paying attention
> to somether things.

This is Sandfart's and Gilmore's trick - substitute a censored list
for the unmoderated one, and hope that no one will notice.

Also a lot "subscribers" to the original list are not real people, but local
redistribution lists, or deamons who post the traffic in local newsgroups or
archive it at various repositories. It would be a good little hack to send a
'who' to majorodomo to get the existing subscribers to cypherpunks,
coderpunks, and cryptography(@c2), and forge a separate "subscribe
cypherpunks-unedited" from each address to majordomo@toad.com. Then let the
ones who don't want duplication unsubscribe from the original list (now
moderated). If someone wants to pull thos off, but needs technical
assistance, please e-mail me offline and I'll explain how to do it.

Of course I can't subscribe to the "unedited" list because the lying
cocksucker John Gilmore (spit) instructed his Majordomo to play dead when it
sees my address.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread