From: WinSock Remailer <winsock@rigel.cyberpass.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f46a6230de45c3d9f5d3546737913949f63a5ed7af87de5385b0ca3040f4396f
Message ID: <199701200612.WAA01713@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-20 06:12:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 22:12:49 -0800 (PST)
From: WinSock Remailer <winsock@rigel.cyberpass.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 22:12:49 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Sandy and the Doc
Message-ID: <199701200612.WAA01713@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com> writes:
> I hope if such a system is set up, people who use it will realize that
> email is not 100% reliable. Just because algebra.com sent mail to
> toad.com, doesn't mean that toad.com actually received it. A small
> fraction of a percent of these messages will be lost.
Failing something catastrophic like a disk failure or a host down for
more than a week, this should not be the case. Almost every site
running sendmail has the Os ("SuperSafe") option set. That means
sendmail will not respond to a "." at the end of a DATA command with
SMTP code 250 until it has written the incoming message (and queue
info) to disk and called fsync. Thus, you may get 2 copies of a
message, but mail messages should not just disappear regularly at all,
even if the network goes down or a machine crashes.
Non-sendmail MTA's tend to be even more strict about this, not even
allowing this behavior to be disabled.
Return to January 1997
Return to “WinSock Remailer <winsock@rigel.cyberpass.net>”
1997-01-20 (Sun, 19 Jan 1997 22:12:49 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Sandy and the Doc - WinSock Remailer <winsock@rigel.cyberpass.net>