1997-01-06 - Re: Will off-topic libertarian bullshit be allowed on the moderated mailing list?

Header Data

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: f5252d29f3eba07d5d2beaf9f3a5dde6de0ff1f983d0675c837f9898eb53caf4
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-970106203927Z-4220@INET-05-IMC.itg.microsoft.com>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1997-01-06 20:40:29 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 12:40:29 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 12:40:29 -0800 (PST)
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Will off-topic libertarian bullshit be allowed on the moderated mailing list?
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-970106203927Z-4220@INET-05-IMC.itg.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	Toto (from the thread "ONE MILLION CHILDREN.....")

I can see that I'm going to have to lay in an extra supply of garlic
and silver bulltets.
 I suspect that everyone on the CypherPunks list is either an employee
of the NSA, or a member of the alleged 'Circle of Eunuchs'.  In the
words of the author of "Make BIG $$$", 
  "Email everybody, and let Eudora sort them out."
.....................................................


You're just tooooo funny, Toto.   
Fortunately you also have some agreeably accurate & serious things to
say as well, such as:

  	Perhaps if the 'experts', busy discussing highly-technical
	 areas, were to take the time to educate those seeking to 
	gain a wider knowledge of cryptography, then CypherPunks 
	would have a broader base of active crypto-related postings.  
	The more plants that you have in your garden, the less room
	there is for weeds.

A broad base of different types of posters makes the list interesting; a
serious consideration of the actual focal subject gives it credibility
and respect.   

Of course, a forum is for conversation; some people who are extremely
focused on their work don't want to talk all that much about it, and
those who have a lot to say aren't necessarily engaged directly in the
actual work involved.   It's also much easier to make many small
comments on a thread than to present a developed, coherent presentation
of one's view.   (I credit Tim May for often posting just such messages
as these.)   

As a non-cryptographer my interest in the subject has to do with the
role it plays in the context of maintaining/expanding "liberty" and of
having tools to employ for privacy and independence from indiscriminate
"regulators".   Reading only about the code wouldn't keep me
super-enthralled.  But seeing the effects of it on all aspects of our
regulated social existence, with the list as a starting point for
understanding, is highly engaging.

   ..
Blanc

>





Thread