From: blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: f577609ce4723338bd55fb66147f9acf4b70fb6fd0d5d2e575fa1bd250d9c0b3
Message ID: <199701310743.XAA06952@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-31 07:43:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 23:43:42 -0800 (PST)
From: blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 23:43:42 -0800 (PST)
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Machine readable form (was:RE: [DES] DES Key Recovery Project, Progress Report #7)
Message-ID: <199701310743.XAA06952@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Phil Karn
You have to admit that it is far more consistent to treat both the
book and the floppy as a munition than to take the position DoS
eventually took. Even if the more consistent position is a far more
restrictive one that has even less chance of surviving a court
challenge.
...........................................................
In terms of consistency, if the government reserved the right to control
printed source code (in the future), and books and floppys containing it
are considered munitions, then cryptographers, who have it in their heads,
would also be considered munitions.
They would have to be prohibited from leaving the country and constrained
not only from using the internet, but from any kind of communications
medium. Ian Goldberg would not be allowed to visit Anguilla or participate
in any more contests. :>)
..
Blanc
Return to January 1997
Return to “blanc <blancw@cnw.com>”
1997-01-31 (Thu, 30 Jan 1997 23:43:42 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Machine readable form (was:RE: [DES] DES Key Recovery Project, Progress Report #7) - blanc <blancw@cnw.com>