1997-01-15 - Re: DCSB: The Internet Consumer – 1996 in Review & Predictions for 1997

Header Data

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Message Hash: f96ea63fdc3e700018f41b757fe43dcd50d9fa8088c436d922f49c0aae10a692
Message ID: <32DC9819.20DD@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: <v03007801af01f45e92d3@[139.167.130.248]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-15 07:37:43 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 23:37:43 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 23:37:43 -0800 (PST)
To: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Subject: Re: DCSB: The Internet Consumer -- 1996 in Review & Predictions for 1997
In-Reply-To: <v03007801af01f45e92d3@[139.167.130.248]>
Message-ID: <32DC9819.20DD@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Robert Hettinga wrote:
>                  The Digital Commerce Society of Boston
>                               Presents
> The group provides numerous Fortune 500 companies with detailed research and
> analysis on behaviors and preferences of Internet consumers.

> Mr. Kaufman will discuss the Internet as a consumer platform.

  As in "Make $$$Money$$$ fast?
  Does putting on a suit and writing 'executive-oriented' postings in a
pompous, pretentious manner raise this type of posting above the level
of ordinary UCE/Spam?
  I don't think so.

  Does moderation mean that UCE postings that promise 'champagne and
caviar' are acceptable, while 'crackers and cheese' post-conference
promises are 'spam'?
  Will 'Subject: Consumer Platform / Make $$$Money Fast' be an 
'acceptable' heading, whereas 'Subject: Make $$$Money Fast / Consumer
Platform' is 'not acceptable'?

Toto
"Moderate suits, not jeans."
(I've got some fine suits, thank you very much. I wear them at weddings,
funerals, and whenever I want to 'screw' somebody.)







Thread