1997-02-06 - Re: “alt.cypherpunks” people?

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0445b923fafa79dabfc149645af46115d0ff9da017711e689090ff6c72f4a6e0
Message ID: <oTFo2D2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970205164716.2442C-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-06 01:01:37 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 17:01:37 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 17:01:37 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "alt.cypherpunks" people?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970205164716.2442C-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Message-ID: <oTFo2D2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org> writes:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> 
> > Anil Das <das@sgi.com> writes:
> > 
> > > Adam Back wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > What do people think of starting an alt.cypherpunks USENET newsgroup?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I have only one objection. I will never post to an Usenet group
> > > under my real email address for fear of ending up in spammer
> > > databases.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Anil Das
> > > 
> > 
> > Learn to use an anonymous remailer.
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately, if everyone is posting from "nobody@thevoid" or such, we'd 
> lose the "personalities" that make up the community. Why not use a "nym" 
> account to post - one that is configured to discard all incoming email?
> 
> -r.w.

Post as "nobody@nowhere.net", but mention e-mail address for replies
in the body of the article (or the signature).

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread