1997-02-14 - Re: Private property & the cypherpunks list(s)

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: stend@sten.tivoli.com (Firebeard)
Message Hash: 07113727514f279652e5cb3163950a82f057722f66722d8009e5a20998325b80
Message ID: <199702140400.WAA28065@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <vpafp876ss.fsf@grendel.tivoli.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-14 04:07:50 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 20:07:50 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 20:07:50 -0800 (PST)
To: stend@sten.tivoli.com (Firebeard)
Subject: Re: Private property & the cypherpunks list(s)
In-Reply-To: <vpafp876ss.fsf@grendel.tivoli.com>
Message-ID: <199702140400.WAA28065@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Firebeard wrote:
> 
> >>>>> Igor Chudov @ home writes:
> 
> IC> This is where the distributed nature of the list comes in.  if
> IC> someone disagrees with Jim's AUP, he or she can use soem other
> IC> mailing list host.
> 
> 	And once I'm up and running, my cypherpunks list server will
> not be interconnected with any server which has a similar AUP.  The
> implication of the AUP is that if you _don't_ comply with it, you will
> be blocked.  Without such an implication, the AUP is meaningless, and
> I'm dedicated that there should be no filtering/blocking of any kind,
> of the list.  Persons behaving 'unacceptably' should be handled by
> social pressures by others in the 'community' of the list, and not by
> policies of the list operators.

Which is, again, a perfectly fine idea.

I would probably disconnect from any server that 

a) does not let certain messages go through (unless they are fighting a DOS
attack) and
b) Alters content of any messages.


	- Igor.





Thread