From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 09d09a93e5f22ad76054af49fd4fb879f3e9836fdd675b3f7e1826598861d34c
Message ID: <199702150826.AAA07223@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-15 08:26:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 00:26:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 00:26:16 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Fuck UseNet (fwd)
Message-ID: <199702150826.AAA07223@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Forwarded message:
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 14:39:41 -0800 (PST)
> From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
> But the distributed mailing list is by far the most interesting
> solution. Contrary to what some have claimed, it really isn't the
> same as usenet -- it allows for distributed control. There is no
> doubt that the operator of a mail list host should have the freedom
> to set his or her policies as they see fit -- it is their machine,
> and their responsibility. And contrariwise, subscribers should have
> the freedom to chose list hosts with compatible philosophies.
Perhaps in addition to the X-foo structures we have discussed already we
might consider adding,
X-distrib-policy: foo
Where foo might be,
Public Domain
All rights reserved, contact author for redistribution
Distribution for non-commercial uses permitted
Refer to authors header
Copyleft
etc.
or whatever the policy might be for a given remailer. This would
significantly aid folks in their shopping around.
Jim Choate
CyberTects
ravage@ssz.com
Return to February 1997
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>”
1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 00:26:16 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fuck UseNet (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>