From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: cryptography@c2.net
Message Hash: 0b8487ff42a5f533c6346a88b517989c62d1b715d2dc19dda71d19789d285652
Message ID: <199702032011.MAA01002@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-03 20:11:17 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:11:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:11:17 -0800 (PST)
To: cryptography@c2.net
Subject: Re: Voice Encrytion/Scrambling
Message-ID: <199702032011.MAA01002@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 05:09 PM 2/2/97 -0800, Huge Cajones Remailer wrote:
>Can anyone comment on and give pointers to devices designed to
>encrypt voice transmission over POTS lines? I am interested in
>the respective sound qualities (if you've tried it) and
>relative strengths of encryption algorithms.
http://www.comsec.com/
Uses 2048 bit DH and 3DES. The voice quality is excellent.
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred
"I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and
violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi
Return to February 1997
Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>”
1997-02-03 (Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:11:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Voice Encrytion/Scrambling - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>