From: azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 14421b4d0a1f6f520303c882e6f6b8de223a6016a89c57189c0637226983dbbb
Message ID: <v02140b0faf2fde130336@[10.0.2.15]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-18 22:33:40 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 14:33:40 -0800 (PST)
From: azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 14:33:40 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: ISP access fee rebuttal
Message-ID: <v02140b0faf2fde130336@[10.0.2.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
If you are interested in the on-going debate over ISP access charges, I
sugest you look at a newly published report perpared for the Internet
Access Coalition. It stomps on the RBOC assertions that dial-in access to
the Net is having a generally negative impact on their telephone networks
from both performance and financial asapects.
http://www2.itic.org/itic/eti_toc.html
--Steve
Return to February 1997
Return to “azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)”
1997-02-18 (Tue, 18 Feb 1997 14:33:40 -0800 (PST)) - ISP access fee rebuttal - azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)