From: blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
To: “cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 16d33ee9847f9866c8ce7e7302046bf37a2e170bff4dbd1dfdeb21739837d330
Message ID: <01BC108F.F7C3BFE0@king1-20.cnw.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-02 06:30:00 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 22:30:00 -0800 (PST)
From: blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 22:30:00 -0800 (PST)
To: "cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Cyphernomicon by Tim May
Message-ID: <01BC108F.F7C3BFE0@king1-20.cnw.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Toto
What currently threatens the list, in my opinion, is not the dissension,
but the rise of a cliquish sheep-mentality and the resulting dismissal
of the opinions of people of Reason (and the opinions of 'anyone', in
general, whom 'I' perceive as being on the 'other side' of an issue).
........................................................................
Who are these sheep you're talking about? At the end of the trial period,
anyone still on the list who doesn't like the moderation can at their
leisure either protest vehemently its continuation, producing masterly
works of eloquence in favor of continuing the free-for-all, or they can
unsubscribe (sp?). They *don't* have to take it, or identify with the
cpunks any longer.
I think what threatens the list is the absence of really major issues to
fire up everyone's sense of indignation & imagination, plus the fact that
many of the long-timers are pretty sophisticated on all the political
issues which have been discussed before (how many of Tim May's long
treatises, engaging, thorough, and relevant as they may be, can one read
yet again without recognizing the repetitive themes therein), plus a lack
of interest in engaging in rhetorical arguments with people who find it
difficult to think in a straight line. Sometimes the posts on the list
come to resemble more attempts at educating the clueless than discussions
among peers which could truly advance an understanding of between fine
points of difference.
Whom can one blame for what does not exist (on the list) - there is no
mechanism for its production; only the attractions of the subject and the
aim, are what bring in the participants who could provide substance and
depth.
Perhaps waxing lyrical on the features of Eudora and regular reminders on
the benefits of mail filtering would be encouraging to "the timid"?
..
Blanc
Return to February 1997
Return to “Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>”