1997-02-05 - re: Moderation, Tim, Sandy, me, etc * Reputation Capital

Header Data

From: “Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>
To: Name Withheld by Request <nobody@replay.com>
Message Hash: 1d83ae906fa9efd93fc45acd624b286f71ea132309f8d33fa5702d4e16c128d2
Message ID: <199702050742.XAA18656@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-05 07:42:54 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:42:54 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "Z.B." <zachb@netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:42:54 -0800 (PST)
To: Name Withheld by Request <nobody@replay.com>
Subject: re: Moderation, Tim, Sandy, me, etc * Reputation Capital
Message-ID: <199702050742.XAA18656@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Name Withheld by Request wrote:

> [snip]
> John Gilmore said:
> >Perhaps at that point I should have shut down the list, as Lucky is
> >now suggesting.  "Asking the list what to do" was clearly not a useful
> >option.  Sandy cared enough about the community to make some concrete
> 
> Not a useful option? Why not? If there aren't any ideas left in this 
> community, I'm with Lucky. Pull the plug.
> [snip]

I've been meaning to ask this for a while...but why *don't* we just pull 
the plug, at least for just a few days?

Unsubscribe everyone from all the lists, wait a bit, and then send a 
message to all of the subscribers with full info on each of the lists 
(cp, cp-unedited,cp-flames) and see what happens when they resubscribe. 

I bet that most of the people who don't post and don't care one way or 
the other wouldn't bother to resubscribe, so we'd have a higher ratio of 
people who mind if the list is moderated vs. those who'd be happy either 
way.  




Zach Babayco 

zachb@netcom.com <-------finger for PGP public key

If you need to know how to set up a mail filter or defend against 
emailbombs, send me a message with the words "get helpfile" (without the 
" marks) in the SUBJECT: header, *NOT THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE!*  I have 
several useful FAQs and documents available.









Thread