1997-02-20 - Re: “cypherpunks is dead…”
Header Data
From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 20f82938721d826db6c7005e437967a331669ec6058d80b66a45781f35bb9d15
Message ID: <199702201937.NAA01962@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <199702200214.SAA04018@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-20 19:18:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 11:18:31 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 11:18:31 -0800 (PST)
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: "cypherpunks is dead..."
In-Reply-To: <199702200214.SAA04018@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199702201937.NAA01962@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> At 3:37 PM -0500 2/19/97, Robert Hettinga wrote:
> is stil bogged down, for reasons I have to believe have to do with
> pressures from somewhere, else why would e-mail packages not make PGP
> support painless?)
There are several packages that do provide at least some level
of PGP integration, but I have 2 very good reasons:
1) The "market place" isn't willing to pay for the additional work.
2) It isn't "sexy" enough to cause a programmer to want to add it
to a mailer just for fun.
Thread
Return to February 1997
- Return to “Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>”
- Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”
- 1997-02-20 (Wed, 19 Feb 1997 18:14:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “cypherpunks is dead…” - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
- 1997-02-20 (Thu, 20 Feb 1997 11:18:31 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “cypherpunks is dead…” - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
- 1997-02-20 (Thu, 20 Feb 1997 11:37:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “cypherpunks is dead…” - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>