From: Rick Osborne <osborne@gateway.grumman.com>
To: cypherpunks mailing list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 215e9a295104067fec541564eafb3844c8a363e38fd9ee13be10df893ae876ef
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970204213710.009681e0@gateway.grumman.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-05 02:38:06 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 18:38:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Rick Osborne <osborne@gateway.grumman.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 18:38:06 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks mailing list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Silly Americans
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970204213710.009681e0@gateway.grumman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
________________________ R i c k O s b o r n e ________________________
I was reading through the news when I stumbled across a thread that made a
very good point. The original poster was talking about the UniSys GIF
patent, and this was the reply:
>Broaden your view. I can do anything I want with the GIF format without
>asking _anyone_, and so can almost everyone in the world - except those
>poor americans who chose to live under a "broken" patent law which
>allows protecting _algorithms_. Totally silly.
It brings up an interesting point, especially when applied to ITAR/EAR. On
a philosophical note, why *do* we allow the government to regulate
algorithms? (Implementations, I can understand, but *algorithms*?)
_________ o s b o r n e @ g a t e w a y . g r u m m a n . c o m _________
"A poem: a story in meter or rhyme."
'Ahh. `There once was a man from Nantucket ... `'
"You've been talking to Garibaldi again, haven't you?"
Return to February 1997
Return to “Rick Osborne <osborne@gateway.grumman.com>”
1997-02-05 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 18:38:06 -0800 (PST)) - Silly Americans - Rick Osborne <osborne@gateway.grumman.com>