1997-02-26 - Re: x-no-archive: yes

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3b6321200dfc7e4151ee0c6b12c63132fa9b3098e4c0aa174b0a45281d3ec8ec
Message ID: <0coP3D74w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <3.0.1.32.19970225133510.007ab9c0@aloha.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-26 03:20:47 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 19:20:47 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 19:20:47 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: x-no-archive: yes
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970225133510.007ab9c0@aloha.com>
Message-ID: <0coP3D74w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


"Dr. Jai Maharaj" <jai@aloha.com> writes:

> boursy@earthlink.net (ISP_Ratings) wrote:
> > aga wrote:
> >> Let's all just start reposting any x-no-archive that we see.
> >
> >  Will do--this works better from a shell as there is
> > more information revealed.  It'll drive those in the
> >'privacy' groups nuts though.
>
> I shall do the same.  Is it a good idea to include a line
> such as "Posting the article so that it may be archived."
> either at the top or bottom of the reposts?

An excellent idea!  Also reposting their garbage from bofh.*
to news.* and alt.flame. :-)

I'd suggest:
 1. "Reposting the article so it can be archived" on top;
 2. Slight alterations of the text (introducing spelling errors etc)
 3. A disparaging remark at the bottom ("what a maroon", "get a clue", etc)

This can be done better by a computer program than by a human being...

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread