1997-02-07 - Re: automated moderation system

Header Data

From: “David E. Smith” <dsmith@prairienet.org>
To: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 4c265f80e0fbb58203ac1e44d6c14a252e18ebbbb85e3165207a3059af16fb6c
Message ID: <3.0.32.19970207164355.006949b4@midwest.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-07 22:58:30 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:58:30 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "David E. Smith" <dsmith@prairienet.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:58:30 -0800 (PST)
To: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: automated moderation system
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970207164355.006949b4@midwest.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 01:15 PM 2/7/97 -0800, you wrote:

[... re: a auto moderations system...]
>now, the mailing list works as follows. people always receive
>posts from people they put on their "pass" lists. mail from
>entities on their "zap" lists is always trashed.
This much, you can do on your own.  Just filter "zap" messages to
/dev/null or somesuch.  (But I see its purpose; keep reading.)

[... using other's pass/zap lists as reputation markers...]
It's a good idea in theory, but would put a lot of load on the server.
For every message * every list subscriber, it has to _at_least_
look up the pass/zap criteria, and possibly do some number-
crunching based on the whole database of pass/zap lists, and keep
track of how long each message has been sitting in the queue
and its ratings by other people.

Also, Mallet could skew the reputations by subscribing with a dozen other
addresses (which M. created just to get the extra "votes"), decide
to have all of them "zap" Alice, and then Bob might never see
Alice's intelligent and thoughtful messages.  (Presumably, Mallet
keeps the bogus addresses subscribed, just dumping all mail into the
bitbucket; any user who leaves the list shouldn't have any weight
in the calculations any longer.)

This also doesn't even address anonymous remailers; Chuck and Dave
might both use the same remailer, even though Chuck only posts
good, meaningful messages (in whatever context) and Dave only
posts flaming ASCII art :)

dave (who doesn't post flaming ascii art, honest)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.5

iQEVAwUBMvuwDnEZTZHwCEpFAQHZMwf+MNIyeFS53QW4LxZzvitFi259xEso3bXT
WXfAqJx7pF8aefZ7U2hBEwPzFyBR5fJWrn4Vekpl6ZK82xJsU2x6Az9+I2D1TYH/
dMAar9S+GcPPlyJ5QegWQ04VopmGzGvDZ69lL1mkJZnl9RT3jWOdVBcmUUUSqrsz
LMGdVxrglx1QIkoZu/P69RheK37HJHiTG6pSokQRQPqyU2VVEwg44yJDicPfjlke
raBLk6EiA6tJ2azKMshEBLm00EjGSHLmstRDqE8x6kb2WMMgCchL9KIe9XIz7fCN
o0L8fTZMME7ZF82/sacnUnzdK6sJ5oAtmgUiT7cZm7Jqo3WU0OmUOw==
=mSMn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread