From: ichudov@algebra.com
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 4ed5dc6239123934eb6d066f7b656206abd28db26738469be78dcc5ced5d001d
Message ID: <199702030611.WAA14241@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-03 06:11:24 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 22:11:24 -0800 (PST)
From: ichudov@algebra.com
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 22:11:24 -0800 (PST)
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater
Message-ID: <199702030611.WAA14241@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
jim bell wrote:
>
> Better yet, set up a system to encourage the public to USE those guns (and
> other weapons) to get rid of the people who pass such laws, and the problem
> is solved.
>
How about this scenario: I borrow 1 million dollars from, let's say,
Phill Hallam-Baker. Not wanting to pay it back, I pay to the
assassination bot and arrange him to be murdered.
Another story: suppose that I negligently caused fire that destroys
house of, say, Toto. Toto knows that if he sues me, I can arrange him
murdered for the amount less than the amount of damages. As a result,
he refrains from suing me, or (if he is a mean person) pays additional
money to have me murdered. A suit would probably be a much better outcome.
Another story: suppose that OKSAS hired me to work for her, but then
our relationships go south and she fires me. Again, her fate is very
unclear, although I would probably spare her life if it were she.
The bottom line is, it becomes very hard to do ANYTHING that disappoints
at least somebody. That can lead to a lot of inefficiencies.
- Igor.
Return to February 1997
Return to “ichudov@algebra.com”
1997-02-03 (Sun, 2 Feb 1997 22:11:24 -0800 (PST)) - Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater - ichudov@algebra.com