1997-02-19 - Re: alt.cypherpunks., cypherpunks@.*

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com
To: Mullen Patrick <Patrick.Mullen@GSC.GTE.Com>
Message Hash: 57059d8f949cd75847b268fce3e0d0270423ffb1912bb7a84e988f2769959e00
Message ID: <199702191657.IAA26706@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-19 16:57:51 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 08:57:51 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 08:57:51 -0800 (PST)
To: Mullen Patrick <Patrick.Mullen@GSC.GTE.Com>
Subject: Re: alt.cypherpunks.*, cypherpunks@*.*
Message-ID: <199702191657.IAA26706@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Mullen, Patrick wrote:
> alt.cypherpunks.ebonics :-) Sorry, couldn't resist!
> 
> Did I miss any?  Name-mangle?

alt.cypherpunks.purebred-sovoks

> I also have listed the following alternate list hosts
> 
> cypherpunks@algebra.com
> cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
> cypherpunks@ssz.com
> 
> If anyone has a more complete list of hosts, I'd be happy
> for additions to the list.

Dave Hayes was going to create one:

Dave Hayes wrote:
Dave> To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org, cypherpunks@toad.com
Dave> Subject: Re: Moderation experiment almost over; "put up or shut up" 
Dave> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:29:41 -0800
Dave> Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Dave> Precedence: bulk
Dave> 
Dave> Ok. I'll "put up". 
Dave> 
Dave> If the cypherpunks will have me, -I'll- run the cypherpunks
Dave> list. Those that know me know that I will *not* censor, moderate, or
Dave> otherwise alter the content (other than the stuff majordomo does with
Dave> "resend") of any messages to the list.

and then wrote:

Dave> To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Dave> Cc: dthorn@gte.net (Dale Thorn), ichudov@algebra.com, cypherpunks@toad.com
Dave> Subject: Re: Moderation experiment almost over; "put up or shut up" 
Dave> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 13:13:40 -0800
Dave> 
Dave> Kent Crispin writes:
Dave> > Dave is offering a single mailing list, which, while I am sure Dave is
Dave> > a great person, still represents a single point of control and a
Dave> > single point of failure.  A distributed mailing list has a potential
Dave> > for being much more robust, and for supporting a wide range of
Dave> > viewpoints.  
Dave> 
Dave> I can also offer my participation in the distributed mailing list, if
Dave> that is what it takes to get cypherpunks free of control interests again.

I am not sure if it already exists...

	- Igor.






Thread