From: Elliot Lee <sopwith@cuc.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 18:44:26 -0800 (PST)
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: DES search publicity (was Re: Cryptanalysis)
In-Reply-To: <199702202226.OAA23750@toad.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970220214241.4314C-100000@helix.cs.cuc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 19 Feb 1997, Adam Back wrote:

> 
> Peter Trei <trei@process.com> writes:
> > Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > > There may be a distributed Internet crack using that approach, 
> > > though DES is still very inefficient on general-purpose computers and 
> > > works better on bit-twiddliing chips.
> > 
> > There's one slowly shaping up, organized by the same people who did 
> > the RC5-48 crack. I'm still rooting for an uncoordinated search, 
> > which is already underway.
> 
> The people who did the RC5-48 crack over on <des-challenge@muffin.org>,
> and <des-pr@mail.des-challenge.xtn.net>, or at least one of them in 
> particular, seems dead set on giving the prize fund 50:50 to the EFF/GNU.  
> I'm having a heck of a time talking him out of it.

http://zero.genx.net/ is going at it as well - and whoever finds the key
gets the prize.

What's wrong with EFF/GNU?

-- Elliot Lee
   http://www.redhat.com/             http://www.linuxexpo.org/