1997-02-12 - Re: Moderation experiment almost over; “put up or shut up”

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Message Hash: 5d2ea925e63e0f781dbb05dd85e34436a6d797c93b4c8fbc8c7db8969c2bfe3d
Message ID: <199702121441.GAB20401@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-12 14:41:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 06:41:23 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 06:41:23 -0800 (PST)
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Subject: Re: Moderation experiment almost over; "put up or shut up"
Message-ID: <199702121441.GAB20401@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


ichudov@algebra.com wrote:
| i have already set up majordomo@algebra.com and cypherpunks@algebra.com 
| and can join.

	While compitition is great (I think this is the second
replacement list?), having multiple cypherpunks lists is a recipie for
confusion and cross-posting, which there is already enough of on
cypherpunks.

	So, I'll make the following suggestion:

	Those who are willing to create lists work together so
that there is a single subscribe address, and a single submit address,
however many exploders exist.

	I would personally prefer to see the name cypherpunks lay
fallow for a while, and suggest cpunks or something similar.

	Note that I'm doing nothing more than making a suggestion.
Take it as my considered enthusiasm for the continuation of
cypherpunks as a list.

Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume








Thread