From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 13:50:19 -0800 (PST)
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com
Subject: Re: Senate spams
In-Reply-To: <Do6T3D92w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <199702282027.UAA00326@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Dimitri Vulis <dlv@bwalk.dm.com> writes:
> Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> writes:
> > Personally I think you're allowing the bad feeling generated by the
> > [CENSORED] PR goofup over Dimitri's false criticisms to cloud your
> > usually good judgement.
> 
> Adam, before labeling my criticisms "false", have you examined the
> source code of the product in quesion to see if it's secure?

Well I have looked at SSLeay, and Ben Laurie's apache-SSL module which
is what StrongHold is based on, but not in any great detail, so I
shouldn't comment one way or another.

If you are suggesting there is a flaw, perhaps you could give some
hints on what the alleged flaw is, so that I could stand a chance of
refuting or confirming your claim, and so that if there is a flaw, it
can be fixed?

I, and I think many others, took your claim to be a PSYOP attempt to
cause a dilemma for Sandy.  If you really did find a flaw, well, lets
here it.  C2Net would owe you an apology.

Adam
--
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`