From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7f907a68840ae6b7c1d49405d3f3a4f76235082a7c8292cfd11fa3bcaf50e0d9
Message ID: <199702111426.GAA19804@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-11 14:26:23 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:26:23 -0800 (PST)
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:26:23 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Who's Censoring Who?
Message-ID: <199702111426.GAA19804@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sandy's e-mailed several of us who've sent messages about Vulis's
ploy to put Sandy in a conflict-of-interest bind -- a well-known attack
on moderators of all kinds, not just on the net.
What's worth admiring is how Vulis has adeptly managed to get others
-- targets and witting and unwitting cohorts -- to go along with his attack,
attack, attack, by opposing or supporting it. A useful lesson.
Smart dude, that Vulis, but no more so than others on the Net, say, Tim
May, and in the world who've done the same elsewhere, maybe
by even smarter dude(s) who provoked, angered, insulted, an unwitting
Vulis, or May, to attack on behalf of ...
But such deception is to be expected, along with feigned suprise and
outrage at the unfairness of opponents fighting as dirty as one's own
pure-blackhearts.
Sandy's not censoring cypherpunks, nor is Vulis or May or any single
person alone. As Pogo said, it's all of us, posters and lurkers and spooks,
each trying to get one's way to prevail, under guise of a high principle not
easily honored when the squeeze is on alone in a dark cell. Come on out
Sandy, it was just a drill.
It's probably worth saving accusations of censorship for the real thing,
after trial usage here for what is truly nasty high-stakes global info-war
gaming.
Return to February 1997
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1997-02-11 (Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:26:23 -0800 (PST)) - Who’s Censoring Who? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>