From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Message Hash: 838db3cd99c721836ef9ab665cd7be668c84473fd58160feffb2ef74ad22c064
Message ID: <199702130513.VAA29422@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-13 05:13:29 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 21:13:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 21:13:29 -0800 (PST)
To: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Subject: Private property rights on cypherpunks
Message-ID: <199702130513.VAA29422@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I forward articles to cypherpunks that are copyrighted by my employers, or
magazines like Playboy and Wired for which I write freelance pieces.
I like to think these articles have some value. I will not forward any of
them, nor would I be able to, if they magically became "public domain."
"De facto public domain" is an idea that deserves to die. Now.
-Declan
On Wed, 12 Feb 1997, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> Forwarded message:
>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 22:46:03 -0800
> > From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
> > Subject: List for discussing many majordomos
>
> > Yes, this is a good idea. One of the proponents of the "many majordomos"
> > project apparently has plans to impose his own ideas about intellectual
> > property on the project, and this seems like a pretty serious thing for a
> > setup that's allegedly going to prevent censorship. We need a place to
> > discuss this.
>
> Please explain how making submissions de facto public domain censors
> anyone?
>
>
> Jim Choate
> CyberTects
> ravage@ssz.com
>
>
>
Return to February 1997
Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>”
1997-02-13 (Wed, 12 Feb 1997 21:13:29 -0800 (PST)) - Private property rights on cypherpunks - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>