From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: Vin McLellan <vin@shore.net>
Message Hash: 872d51b9985987d502e1362cac7daf76f9ccde963225ebf338bbf170a034d3c9
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19970207164600.006a07e4@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-07 16:51:55 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 08:51:55 -0800 (PST)
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 08:51:55 -0800 (PST)
To: Vin McLellan <vin@shore.net>
Subject: Re: 40-bit RC5 crack meaningless??
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970207164600.006a07e4@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Paul Strassmann served on the "Information Warefare - Defense"
Task Force sponsored by the Defense Science Board. He has a
Web site at:
http://www.strassmann.com
The IW-D report recounts most of the well-known info-war memes
to buttress its plea for more info-warfighting funds, and says that
business needs DoD protection.
It de-emphasizes the encryption debate, claiming that crypto is not
an important part of the problem or the solution. Remailers are not
mentioned.
Short and long versions of IW-D:
http://jya.com/iwd.htm
Winn Schwartau's infowar.com offers it too.
SAIC was generously represented on the Task Force: Strassmann,
Bellcore's head, a couple more. As well as others committed to "raising
the bar" against attack on Info-Maginot:
http://jya.com/iwdaff.htm
Return to February 1997
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1997-02-07 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 08:51:55 -0800 (PST)) - Re: 40-bit RC5 crack meaningless?? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>