1997-02-14 - Re: crypto restrictions

Header Data

From: Jeremiah A Blatz <jer+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: anand@querisoft.com
Message Hash: 8cfb82e2bb72b77a7d6608f62eebe5e9a948acfba9a366adcda1b58f3592788e
Message ID: <199702141441.GAA06709@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-14 14:41:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 06:41:29 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Jeremiah A Blatz <jer+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 06:41:29 -0800 (PST)
To: anand@querisoft.com
Subject: Re: crypto restrictions
Message-ID: <199702141441.GAA06709@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

anand abhyankar <anand@querisoft.com> writes:
> Jeremiah A Blatz wrote:
> 
> thanx for ur answer but then i have another question.
> 
> 1) is it illegal to develop an encryption tool (s/w) outside the US
> which uses > 40 bit size session keys and then import that s/w inside of
> the US.

It's legal in the US, but other countries have export restrictions,
too. They're usually pretty hard to find out about, especially
considering that the people who passed the laws don't have a clue what
the law means.

Your best place to check is the Crypto Law Survey at
http://cwis.kub.nl/~frw/people/koops/lawsurvy.htm
The disclamer states that the findings may not be "exaustive or
legally reliable," and given the opacity of crypto laws, you'd better
belive it. That said, it is an excellent resource.

cypherpunks newbie patrol,
Jer

"standing on top of the world/ never knew how you never could/ never knew
 why you never could live/ innocent life that everyone did" -Wormhole

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQB1AwUBMwQOAckz/YzIV3P5AQFUJgL+KhGiQ/N6Nrt95d4UhF+MFUtTxsbWUTDx
5cKtCz2HEG4TqoHQJ0vt/njOMqzBdNgVma9vqC/cWoczOgRXHEmcPuXN0Zd2fOKT
KxMOtZzLwvCUSJEYY8q9PZ5lY4NIDcyQ
=W32O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread