From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 20:18:15 -0800 (PST)
To: ravage@einstein.ssz.com (Jim Choate)
Subject: Re: Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199702122057.MAA04643@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199702130414.XAA09293@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jim Choate wrote:
| 
| Forwarded message:
| 
| > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 14:22 EDT
| > From: "E. Allen Smith" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.rutgers.edu>
| 
| > 	Umm... because you'll eventually accumulate _lots_ of addresses
| > that don't work, which will slow things down tremendously in sending
| > mail out?
| 
| The current subscription is between 1,000 and 2,000 I don't think that is
| _lots_. All we need to do is count the number of bounces per address in
| a given period, the SSZ end is trying to decide between weekly or
| monthly cleanings, and then clear that address. At no point would I need
| to archive the original bounce.

qmail has bounce management software for its list management tools.
(bounceman) "Russell Nelson has a bounce manager which <b>totally</b>
eliminates any need to deal with bounces."

www.qmail.org




-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume