From: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Message Hash: aa865a101d080a413ee988a7cd61ecb590410ff0a5a08d4f593169f4fcce6871
Message ID: <v03007801af2bb7fecac8@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply To: <199702150843.AAA07793@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-15 18:56:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 10:56:16 -0800 (PST)
From: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 10:56:16 -0800 (PST)
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Subject: Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997
In-Reply-To: <199702150843.AAA07793@toad.com>
Message-ID: <v03007801af2bb7fecac8@[207.167.93.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:19 AM -0600 2/15/97, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
>I much prefer the plan where a potential mail correspondant includes an
>e-cash dollar directly cashable by me. If I like the mail (and the
>sender), I throw the dollar away and the sender goes on the approved
>list. If not, I keep the dollar, and the sender goes on the twit list.
>Paper junk mail costs an advertiser more than $1 per piece, so they'd
>still be getting a bargain. And potentially, some receivers may throw
>away the dollar and welcome the spam.
The basic flaw in all of these schemes is that they are "top-down"
solutions, imposed on the market for invented reasons.
The reason paper mail "spam" (advertisements, solicitations, whatever)
costs whatever it costs (hint: less than a dollar...check the Bulk Rate
prices, and look for the 8-cent and 16-cent stamps on many of the
solicitations) is because this is what the Postal Service charges.
Granted, the USPS is hardly a free market player, and uses force to keep
out competitors, but the general principle is that some semi-market-based
fee is charged, and larger packages will cost more, etc.
The basic flaw with e-mail is that the senders of e-mail are not paying for
carriage.
However, just "making up" a fee--as Roy does here, and as Jim Bell and
others have done before--is not a solution either. Nor does it stand any
chance of being "enforced" (for a large number of reasons I won't get into
here).
I don't expect any solutions anytime soon, but I certainly will not push
for "synthetic" prices which do not solve the underlying problem.
--Tim May
Just say "No" to "Big Brother Inside"
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, I know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
Return to February 1997
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”